Welcome to Surveillance Capitalism – the tech giants stealing your private data

Surveillance Capitalism is here. It watches your every online movement and wants to commodify your next moment. It’s in your browser and it’s doing it now.

As you read this sentence your internet browser is quietly scooping up your raw digital exhaust and shovelling into a data lake.

From there, AI robots, machine learning and data scientists will organise, analyse and monetise your personal information.

Whatever device or operating system you use to consume these words – in a smartphone, a tablet, laptop, desktop or smartwatch – Apple, Windows, Android or Linux, you create a little trail. And that trail can be used to affect your life.

We are gluttons for connections

Over 4.5 billion people – comprising 60 percent of the global population – are active internet users. The average user spends 6 hours and 43 minutes online each day. And since COVID-19, research shows that 50% of consumers are on social media more since lockdown measures were put in place.

Every day, every hour, every minute we exude valuable bytes into the traffic of the internet ether. As we trek from page to page, site to site, app to app, device to device, phone tower to phone tower, wi-fi to wi-fi, car to desktop, supermarket to gym – the big data capitalists extract the oil from each digital handshake.

Smart, hyperconnected and addicted

Over 90% of Australians own a mobile phone and nearly half of us check our mobile device at least once every 30 minutes. That scroll-and-swipe, highly addictive behavioural information is pure gold to those that have access to it.

Our homes get smarter by the year, with nearly three-million Australian households now using smart speakers. TVs, doorbells and voice-controlled vacuum cleaners all share private information to third parties for consumer behaviour and marketing objectives.

Every time we log in, load a page, swipe an ID or credit card, play a game, use a smartwatch – virtually anything we do every day – we are tracked. We cannot escape it. We are hyperconnected.

We need it: to check our bank balance, pay our bills, to drive our car, to use public transport, to hail a ride-share, to order dinner. We do our tax, we access our health records, we share a workplace cloud, we upload assignments, we check the weather and facetime the folks. All to get through the necessarily digital day.

Digital footprints

Data exhaust – the records and traces we leave behind as we traverse the internet is our digital footprint. We unwittingly, yet willingly gift this stuff into the hands of the Surveillance Capitalists. It happened as you arrived at this page – you dropped a little data nugget. Did you tick the “accept cookies” box? Did you read all the Ts and Cs for every page and app to get here?

Either way – you choose to share your data. Consent to your private data is often assumed. And that consent is regularly abused. A recent Irish report found almost all websites it studied revealed cookie and tracking compliance issues – some with serious breaches.

Stealing our private experience

The guru of Surveillance Capitalism is Professor Shoshanna Zuboff. She is the author of The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power.

In a recent interview, Zuboff explained: “Surveillance capitalism exists by unilaterally taking – what any eight-year-old would translate as stealing – our private experience, translating it into behavioural data for analysis, manufacture, and sales.”

In her 700-page tome Zuboff describes the: “new phase in economic history in which private companies and governments track your every move with the goal of predicting and controlling your behaviour. Under surveillance capitalism you are not the customer or even the product: you are the raw material.”

But do we know what happens to our data? A recent Deloitte report shows that only 7% of consumers had a very good understanding of how their personal information would be used after they consented to its use.

Nevertheless, this seemingly innocuous data contains invaluable information about the choices we make, our actions and preferences. It may include log files, cookies, temp-files and much more – often termed metadata – and this information is generated in almost every digital process or transaction.

Once accumulated, across all those transactions (micro-moments as Google coins them), that’s a lot of data. Image all of it. Generated all day every day by billions of us. It is Big Data.

Once analysed, this data can reveal individually significant information to marketers and business entities. And it works. As I write this article my Facebook feed is advertising smart vacuum cleaners, cookies, surveillance cameras and data lakes ad nauseum.

Data Exhaust to divine your future

In the early days of the web, data exhaust was considered waste. But the then fledgling search engine company Google discovered how the behavioural residue from user searches, can predict and monetise human experience. Even better, they could grab it for free.

The Surveillance capitalists (Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple et al) want all your data. They are listening. They need to know the things you say, how and why you say them. The more data they collect, the clearer the data portrait – the easier to monetise your behaviour.

Google says: by utilizing its analytics tools, businesses can “predict future actions people may take,” including predicting the “likelihood that users who have visited your app or site will purchase in the next seven days.” Effectively, Google confidently offers prediction behaviour products. And if your business can predict user behaviour, it can modify future consumer activities.

Likewise, Facebook will “use data from advertisers and other partners about your activity on their websites and apps, as well as certain offline interactions; use information we have about others and their activity; use data like your activity on websites off Facebook to decide which ads to show you… based on information from a specific business that has shared a list of individuals or devices with us.”

Indeed, an Intercept article shows how the social media giant goes further than just a few personal ads on your feed. Facebook will use your data “to train AI prediction models that will be used to target and extract money from you on the basis of what you’re going to do in the future.”

Willingly tracked and happily commodified

Google and Facebook collect an alarming amount of data as you travel the digital universe. And most rational people would not let governments or corporations install tracking devices or establish cameras and microphones in our homes – yet we have.

We’ve eagerly enabled the digital giants to follow us, collect data, predict and affect our daily lives. We should be concerned that despite convenience, a furtive capitalism is at work beneath our complex digital experience.

This new and highly lucrative economy is poised to manipulate as it shares our behavioural data across its murky networks. The issue is what happens to all the data. Who is it shared with and how are we being manipulated for profit?

Surveillance Capitalism is watching. Waiting. Predicting the future…

===

References

Excuse me – WTF is MMT?

In 2020, governments around the world are spending phenomenal amounts of money.

Globally, they are injecting trillions of dollars into their economies to help resolve the devastating effects of a global recession brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.

In Australia alone, federal treasury expects the total Commonwealth debt under the Morrison Government to soon surpass a trillion dollars.

Indeed, the $130-billion Job-Keeper scheme alone, is the largest single economic bailout in Australian history.

In the recent 2020-21 October budget, the government declared its total COVID-19 response and recovery support so far, was $507 billion – including $257 billion in direct economic support.

And net debt is forecast to peak at a record $966bn or 44% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by June 2021.

That’s some big fat debt.

But, as the Australian government throws billions into welfare and infrastructure projects to kickstart the economy, the question being asked is: will Treasury ever run out of money?

Well, the proponents of MMT (or Modern Monetary Theory) say: Nope! A modern government running out of money is not even a thing.

If it wants to, it can spend itself into existence.

No way! Wait, what even is MMT?

Well, it’s kinda complicated. But in a nutshell…

The contemporary ideology of MMT has been around for decades and proposes that a government with its own sovereign currency – Australia, Japan, the USA for example – needn’t fret about balancing its federal budget or accruing too much debt.

This is mostly because governments can effectively print as much money as they need (or create digital money) ad infinitum.

And what’s more, they can pay it back whenever they like.

Excuse me, but you can’t run a household like that!

That’s because a federal government is not actually a household.

We hear this comparison all the time: “the government budget is just like your household budget.”

Well, not really.

MMT theorists state that the spending goal of a federal government is not the same as a suburban household.

Federal governments aim to support an entire national economy, whereas a household budget is concerned with only its simple, domestic economic situation.

In other words, a handful of people who live in a house, in a street – as opposed to 25 million citizens is not the same!

Household budgets are about balancing the income and expenses of a family – not juggling a nation.

Indeed, the federal government can effectively print money… and a household cannot. At least, not legally!

Spend first, tax later

The concept of MMT argues, rather than taxing or borrowing before they spend into the economy, governments should spend money into the economy before they tax or borrow from it.

Make sense? In essence, MMT asserts that government spending effectively precedes taxation.

And if there are enough workers and infrastructure in place to meet growing demand – without inciting inflation (i.e. a rise in the overall level of prices for goods and services consumed by households), the government can and should spend what it needs to maintain employment and achieve goals.

Indeed, the argument is that governments should use all its available fiscal levers, like taxation and incentives etc to fine-tune economic policy and make things happen in society, such as addressing the climate crisis, tackling obesity or overcoming tobacco addiction and the old chestnut: building roads and hospitals.

But, dude we will run out of money!

Not according to the MMT experts.

“As long as parliament can pass a government budget – running out of money is literally impossible in our modern-day monetary system,” says Steven Hail, Professor of Economics at the University of Adelaide.

“Our government is a full monetary sovereign – it spends the currency into existence and then taxes some of it back out of existence again. It can never run out of its own currency,” he says. “The only constraint on government spending is inflation risk.”

Professor Hail says the important thing to understand is that the federal government is the monopoly issuer of our currency, and as such has nothing in common with households.

All good, but…

Economics commentator and former Deutsche Bank director, Claire Rushe accepts the basic MMT principles but doesn’t necessarily agree with all of its elements.

MMT is not some “pie in the sky,” she claims. “It is happening, and we are doing it right now. And I do think significant components of it are highly relevant in the current environment.”

She believes countries with their own currency will recover easier from the effects of COVID-19 – rather than those (in the European Union for example) who cannot print their own money.

“People get confused, its not like a household or a company budget where they have to balance their books,” she says.

“They try to put their own personal economics into government policy and it just doesn’t work – they are very different beasts.”

Ms Rushe says that with interest rates so low at the moment, and the cost of debt so cheap, there is very little risk of inflation.

With Australia facing around a trillion dollars in debt, she doesn’t think a deficit is necessarily a bad thing – but it comes with a big caveat: “The money needs to be spent effectively, and not frittered away,” she warns.

Like unemployment?

“The government should spend whatever is required to achieve full employment… where anyone that is able and wants one – can have a job,” says Ms Rushe.

If everyone has a job – in other words Full Employment – the supply and demand cycle of an economy might work in harmony.

Get a Job!

And this is where MMT suggests the concept of a “Job Guarantee.”

Under a Job Guarantee system, the federal government would ensure ongoing employment by providing a moderately-waged employment to pay for housing, transport, food etc to anyone who wants a job.

Using the numerous fiscal tools at its disposal, the government might create various entry-level jobs for people such as bus-driving, aged-care, child-care – and invest in matching citizen’s skills to the most appropriate jobs. Or offer training to suit.

This seemingly radical approach to tackling youth unemployment and insecure work was suggested in a recent report by Australian public policy think tank Per Capita.

The bottom line is that everyone would be guaranteed a job, including during economic recessions and forced unemployment may be a thing of the past.

Maybe NMT?

Does Professor Hail think MMT will eventually become Normal monetary theory?

“Yes, and I think there is such momentum now, that it is unstoppable. It might not be called MMT. It will be standard economics,” he says.

And as Claire Rushe asserts: “We are already doing it! We just don’t know it…”

Make sense?

If not, watch Lukenomic’s fun take on the whole thing…

RBA holds steady on cash rate in light of Budget stimulus

Record low interest rates are likely to continue in the wake of the Federal budget as the Reserve Bank of Australia considers ways to support jobs and economic growth, economists predict.

The record-low cash rate target of 0.25% remains unchanged for the seventh month in a row, following emergency measures taken in March to reduce impacts of a COVID-driven recession.

Economics commentator and former Deutsche Bank investment banker Claire Rushe said the RBA’s decision to maintain the current cash rate setting was not surprising.

“With fiscal policy drip-feeding all day, why would you use the last bullet of monetary policy,” she said.

“It would be quite poor timing.”

The RBA also considered future “additional monetary easing,” signalling further rate cuts as the economy expands.

Despite the RBA’s “dovish” language, Ms Rushe said she was sceptical of deeper rate cuts.

She said her time at Deutsche Bank during the 2008 global financial crisis saw wholesale slashing of rates, resulting in clients “paying money to put cash in the bank.”

“Cash rates going down further may not have much kick,” Ms Rushe said.

“But dovish language like this keeps the general population thinking there is monetary policy potential to support it. Hopefully, they don’t need to use it.”

Ms Rushe said it would be worthwhile to see how the Federal government’s fiscal stimulus handled the reduction of JobKeeper and JobSeeker.

The RBA noted economic recovery was under way in most of Australia, although the second-wave covid-19 outbreak in Victoria had resulted in “further contraction.”

With the differing levels of economic recovery around the country, Ross Forrester, director of Westcourt Accounting in Perth, said he expected the central bank to remain stoic.

“The blunt instrument of the RBA has big impact – if you change interest rates, you change them across Australia,” he said.

“Whereas the government’s fiscal stimulus can target business needs in places like Victoria and New South Wales which are more affected than say, WA.”

The RBA is expected to publish a full set of updated forecasts next month.

Published in the NewsVineWA – student journalism publication for Edith Cowan University in Western Australia:

RBA holds steady on cash rate in light of Budget stimulus

WA’s container deposit scheme launched

Western Australians can now cash in their eligible drink containers for a 10-cent refund at over 200 Containers for Change refund points across the State.

Most aluminium, glass, plastic, steel and liquid paperboard drink containers between 150ml and 3L are eligible.

There are four types of refund points in WA where you can return eligible containers: Depots, Bag Drops, Reverse vending machines and Pop-up refund points.

WA Premier Mark McGowan said the scheme is an important step forward for recycling in Western Australia.

“People in WA use 1.3 billion drink containers every year, that’s 3.5 million a day, 150,000 an hour and more than 2,000 a minute. We know that currently, these containers make up 41 per cent of all litter here in Western Australia,” Mr McGowan said. “Western Australians have been crying out for a container deposit scheme.”

Containers for Change also provides fundraising opportunities for community groups – enabling Western Australians to give back to their local community.

WA Environment Minister Stephen Dawson said over 1,000 organisations have already registered and expected that number to grow.

“I’d strongly encourage all Western Australians to get involved, to start returning their eligible containers and start making change,” the Minister said.

Eligible containers included on the scheme’s list of products must display the refund mark (e.g. “10c refund at collection depots/points in participating State/Territory of purchase”).

Excluded containers include: Any plain milk containers, glass containers which have contained wine or pure spirits, containers 1L or larger which have contained flavoured milk, pure fruit or vegetable juice, all cordial or syrup containers, and registered health tonics.

Coordinator of the container deposit scheme, Western Australia Return Recycle Renew (WARRRL), said once containers are returned they join other recycled goods sold through an international online auction portal.

Recyclers then convert containers into raw materials like aluminium ingots and shredded plastic, which can be re-manufactured into new products.

Western Australia is the fifth state or territory to adopt a container deposit scheme, following the lead of South Australia, Northern Territory, New South Wales, Australian Capital Territory and most recently, Queensland.

Further information about Containers for Change, including refund point locations can be found at http://www.containersforchange.com.au

WA’s container deposit scheme launched

New inner-city campus for ECU

The WA government has announced a new Edith Cowan University Campus for Perth’s CBD.

The $695 million project will see the development of a vertical campus at the central Perth City Link, next to Yagan Square, offering programs in technology, business, creative and performing arts.

The site adjoins Perth Railway Station, on the newly developed link between the CBD and the entertainment district of Northbridge.

ECU will contribute $300 million to the project, while the Federal Government will contribute $245 million as part of the Perth City Deal. The State Government is providing in-kind support through the provision of land.

The jointly funded, world-class campus will be the centrepiece of a Perth City Deal, designed to bring the energy and vibrancy of more than 9,000 students and staff to the heart of Perth’s CBD by 2025.

The ECU City Campus will bring together programs in technology, industry and creativity, including the WA Academy of Performing Arts, the school of Business and Law and an advanced technology and cyber security centre.

Premier Mark McGowan said the new university will attract thousands of people into the city, “delivering a huge boost to local businesses and building on Perth’s reputation as a vibrant cultural and entertainment district”.

ECU Vice-Chancellor Steve Chapman said: “This is an outstanding result for ECU and for the State. We are delighted to be working with all levels of government to create Perth’s first comprehensive university campus in the heart of the city.”

New inner-city campus for ECU

Lack of Diversity on Australian TV – Interview with Professor James Arvanitakis

A landmark study of television news and current affairs has found that presenters, commentators and reporters on Australian television – are overwhelmingly of an Anglo-Celtic background.

The study shows that television media has an “extraordinarily long way to go” in boosting representation of people from diverse backgrounds.

RTRFM’s Allan Boyd spoke with one of the report authors: Professor James Arvanitakis – from Western Sydney University to discuss the report findings.

==

Australia credits itself on being a successful multicultural society – but a new report shows that our TV content does not accurately reflect the make-up of the wider community. This is especially evident in television News. It’s been described as a “Whitewash”.

According to new research by four Australian universities – in partnership with Media Diversity Australia – television news media and current affairs – lacks cultural and linguistic diversity.

The report, released last week entitled “Who Gets To Tell Australian Stories?” investigates Australian television – and illustrates that TV news content – is far more Anglocentric than the country it represents – and implies a lack of cultural diversity…

I spoke with James Arvanitakis – from Western Sydney University – who is one of the report authors.

Locals ignored over Ocean Reef Marina redevelopment – Interview with Alison Xamon MLC

Has the local community been kept in the dark about the enormous Ocean Reef Marina development in Perth’s northern suburban coast?

RTRFM Perth Indymedia Radio’s Allan Boyd spoke with North Metro MLC Alison Xamon about claims over the lack of community consultation – and why locals are concerned over the sheer scale of a housing development beachfront site… (Save Ocean Reef)

RTRFM 92.1 – Monday 24 August 2020

Media Name and Shame – Interview with Dr Denis Muller

Interview with Dr Denis Muller by Allan Boyd on RTRFM Thursday 06 August 2020.

SCROLL DOWN FOR AUDIO INTERVIEW

Anyone who follows the news, will know that two young Brisbane women – returning to Queensland from Victoria recently – had allegedly broken coronavirus border restriction laws. It was alleged that they had lied on their border declaration forms to avoid quarantine after a party trip to Melbourne.

The two teenagers have now been named and shamed by Australia’s big media. Last week, the Courier Mail – Brisbane’s only daily newspaper – labelled the women “Enemies of the State” on the front page.

Multiple media outlets – including the ABC, Herald Sun, Sydney Morning Herald, the Age, Brisbane Times, Daily Mail and commercial television outlets – also named the women and published their photographs – which were taken from their social media accounts.

But shouldn’t the right to privacy apply equally to everyone?

To talk about all this is journalism expert Dr Denis Muller – Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Advancing Journalism – University of Melbourne…

Ten-year-olds do not belong in detention – Interview with Dr Chris Cunneen

Interview with Dr Chris Cunneen by Allan Boyd on RTRFM Thursday 30 July 2020.

SCROLL DOWN FOR AUDIO INTERVIEW

Across Australia, children as young as 10 – can be arrested by police, charged with an offence, remanded in custody, convicted by the courts – and imprisoned.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are disproportionately impacted by these laws – accounting for 65 per cent of children in prisons.

There is a growing community campaign, calling on our leaders to raise the age of criminal responsibility to at least 14.

This week, Australia’s state and federal attorneys-general met to discuss raising the age of criminal responsibility.

To discuss this – Allan Boyd caught up with Doctor Chris Cunneen, Professor of Criminology, University of Technology Sydney – and asked him:

How many children are locked up around the country at the moment?

You can read Chris’s article in the Conversation this week – and find out more about the campaign to raise the age of Criminal Responsibility at raisetheage.org.au

(Article in The Conversation: Ten-year-olds do not belong in detention. Why Australia must raise the age of criminal responsibility – Dr Chris Cunneen – Professor of Criminology, University of Technology Sydney)

Parler, Twitter and the concept of Free Speech – Interview with Audrey Courty

Interview with Audrey Courty– PhD candidate, School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science, Griffith University. Played on RTRFM – Perth Indymedia (27/07/2020)

SCROLL DOWN FOR AUDIO INTERVIEW

There’s been noisy accusations recently – that social media platforms are suppressing users right to free speech.

Among the so-called stifling of debate – rival platform – Parler is gaining interest for its so-called, self-claimed anti-censorship stance.

Parler claims it is a non-biased free speech driven entity – but is it?

Over recent months – “anti-twitter” – right-leaning users have flocked to the Parler or the alt-Twitter as it has been dubbed – whose main selling point is that it vows to champion free speech.

With me to talk about all this is Audrey Courty – digital media and political communications specialist – and a PhD candidate at the School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science – Griffith University

Audrey’s article “Parler: what you need to know about the ‘free speech’ Twitter alternative” was published in the Conversation recently.